Friday, December 23, 2016

“Dream a Dream” Christmas Eve 2016




Dream a dream, a hopeful dream,  as children do on Christmas Eve,
   imaginings,  surprising thing,  to hold and to believe.

Christmas is a time of dreaming – a young boy boards a Christmas train to Santa’s village – and learns about kindness, courage, friendships, the true spirit of Christmas – simple dreams, and faith. A man shrivelled in his soul, who shuts out life – visited in dreams by four messengers – Spirits – who come to reclaim his soul to new life. In the Hebrew Scriptures – Joseph dreams; Micah the prophet dreams; Samuel dreams a call to ministry. In the New Testament, Elizabeth dreams a messenger who tells her she will have a child named John; Mary dreams an angel telling her she will have a child, - God-with-Us, Emmanuel; Joseph dreams the word that Mary tells the truth; he dreams again – a call to run from Herod – and Joseph, Mary and Jesus become refugees in another country; the Magi follow a light in the sky, and are led in dreams. All of them are dreams full of hope, imaginings – things which surprise, which tell a story  - and which offer something to hold, and believe. God’s dream, God’s imagination at work, God surprising the human world, every year as we re-create the birth of what we hold and believe.

Dream a peace, our planet’s peace, the greening of the earth at play;
 the holy ground where life is found, where God has touched the clay.

The Garden of Eden – the earth growing, greener and greener, full of beautiful things coming from the imagination of the Creator.  A tiny spinning planet, off in an obscure corner of a huge galaxy, in an even larger universe. A dream made real. Human beings, rising from the holy ground where God’s fingers reached into the clay and began to work. Generation after generation of children born, and the hope and dreams wrapped up in each of them, and their imaginations and dreams creating other things, time passing and the dreams coming into reality. Dreams to hold and believe – that the earth can be green, that people can and will live in peace with each other.

Dream a gift, the Christmas gift that changes everything we see;
 the shimmering of angel wing, the Child the mystery.

Gifts. Throughout the centuries people in many places gathered on December 21 to celebrate the shortest day and the longest night. Gifts were given, prayers offered. Christmas too, the Christ-Mass, became part of those celebrations, and they became part of us. The celebration of the birth of a child, new life, a seemingly ordinary baby, yet a child with a vision – a dream – the realm of God, holy ground where life is found, where the earth is green and blooming, where people live together with each other – in peace. Looking through the eyes of Jesus, everything around us changes and we see in a new way. A child, a mystery, the hope of faith, the one to follow.

“Don’t be afraid” said the shimmering angel . “You will have a child and you will call him Emmanuel which means ‘God is with us’. “Don’t be afraid” said the shimmering angels to the shepherds sitting out in the fields -  “We bring news of great joy. A child is born, who will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Prince of Peace. “ And they sang and sang. And the shepherds went, right away, to see this miracle.

Dream a dream – Love has come among us. Love is born this night. Dream, and live.

"Dream a Dream" words by Shirley Erena Murray. Music by Ron Klusmeier.

Saturday, December 10, 2016

The Heralds of Christmas December 11, 2016 Annesley United Church, Markdale Ontario.




In the stories of Advent, leading us into Christmas – Elizabeth, Zechariah, Mary and Joseph are all visited by angels – messengers from God, whispering into their ears while they slept. For every one of them, those whisperings guided what they did, and they trusted. Messengers.

Dreams are strange things. We can do things in dreams that we can’t do during our waking hours. Musicians tell stories of memorising pieces of music in dreams, or composing music in dreams. The composer, Franz Schubert, reportedly slept with paper and pencil beside the bed, and his glasses on, in case he had a great idea for music while he slept. Our minds keep on working while we are asleep. Dreams tell us things about ourselves that we aren’t always able to face otherwise. There may be a logical explanation, but to me it is still miraculous what the mind can do, and how it can help us see ourselves. And the line between dreams and reality is often negligible.

During the industrial revolution, Charles Dickens wrote stories about the abysmal conditions in which most people lived. “A Christmas Carol” is probably the best known, and its message is timeless. If someone had told Scrooge he was going to have four messengers, he probably would have had some snarly and pithy answer. He tried to write off Marley’s appearance as a piece of moldy cheese.

But those ghosts – heralds, angels, messengers – do make their appearance, and Scrooge is confronted with his own life in review. His old partner, Marley comes to speak to him of his reclamation. His soul’s reclamation. And Scrooge is on his knees before Marley, faced with the question “Do you believe in me?!!!” and in terror he responds “I do, I must!!”

The Ghost of Christmas Past is a spirit of great age, yet appearing young – and shining with a light so bright Scrooge cannot bear it, and asks for it to be covered. ``What!'' exclaimed the Ghost, ``would you so soon put out, with worldly hands, the light I give? Is it not enough that you are one of those whose passions made this cap, and force me through whole trains of years to wear it low upon my brow!'' It can be hard, that harsh light of truth.

So we travel into Scrooge’s past. We see a small boy, sitting in a classroom at boarding school, while his classmates go home for Christmas. His mother died giving birth; and in grief, his father rejected the baby. A little bit of this boy hardens up and closes away. As we follow his life, a sister he loved, a harsh unforgiving parent who refuses to acknowledge him - we find hints and suggestions of abuse, deep anger and hurt, we never quite know exactly. This sister died, giving birth to Scrooge’s nephew. And Scrooge rejects the nephew as his father had rejected him.

We dance through Fezziwig’s Christmas party – every year Scrooge’s employer closed down the business early, pushed all the chairs out of the way – laid on a feast, and Christmas celebrations. And finally he is confronted by the woman he has loved, as she lets him free of his promises to her. Another idol  - one of gold – has replaced her. It is telling that when she leaves, Scrooge lets her go, not having the will to let go his obsession with only financial gain.

Christmas Present, the third herald, is a boisterous one, full of energy and compassion. “You’ve never seen the likes of me before, have you?” he asks. In the Albert Finney musical version of the movie, Scrooge finds himself getting quite giddy on a drink the spirit offers him. “I’ve never tasted the likes of this” to which the Spirit replies “Yes, I supposed you haven’t. It’s called the milk of human kindness”. Scrooge asks the Spirit if there is any special flavour in the water. The spirit answers that there is a special flavour in any meal kindly given, but especially a poor one. When asked why a poor one, the spirit responds  “ Because it is needed the most.”

We see how little Scrooge knows even about his clerk, Bob Cratchit - that Bob had children, one of whom was ill. When Scrooge asks if Tim the child will live, he is given back his own words “If he’s going to die, he should do it, and decrease the surplus population.” As this Spirit moves on, he leaves Scrooge with one particularly pertinent message. Under his robe huddle two scrawny, thin and sickly children with hands like claws. “This one is Ignorance” says the ghost “and this is Want. Beware both of them, but particularly beware Ignorance.” Asking if there are no services for them, the ghost answers with Scrooge’s words in the beginning of the story -  “Are there no factories, are there no poorhouses?”

It never ceases to strike me how relevant this message is even today. We all know people who have been hurt by life, through no fault of their own, but who carry the grief, who close themselves off, or make something else more important. Scrooge is not, in fact, a particularly complicated man. He has simply reacted to the hurt and disappointment in his life by building protections for himself – hoarding wealth and making that an objective.

Christmas Yet to Come, the final messenger, demonstrates the consequences of not being attuned, not being engaged in the world, and not reflecting on ourselves and how we affect the world. A father walks slowly home; a small chair sits empty, with a small crutch beside it. It is not because of anything Scrooge did which caused the death, but precisely the opposite - he didn’t do anything. He minded his own narrow business and the rest of the world minded theirs, or so he thought. He blanked out most of the world - the poor and marginalised, the hungry and mentally ill, the sick and bereaved, the lonely and hurt - they are precisely our business - Ignorance and Want are our business. Remember Marley’s words  - paraphrased – “Mankind was supposed to be my business, the  common welfare was my business.”

Scrooge sees a man dead, and someone stealing the very slippers off the body’s feet. He sees his own belongings being sold off by his housekeeper. He finds himself in a graveyard, seeing his own name etched on a gravestone. The reality of his very meagre existence comes crashing in on him: “I am not the man I once was, I am a new person, I will keep Christmas in my heart. Tell me these are not the shadows of things that will be, but the shadows of things that may be”. Tell me that it’s not too late to change the course of the future…..

Whatever we do or don’t do - either by action or by inaction - there are consequences. Cause and effect - everything has some kind of consequence, some kind of result. We cannot be disengaged from the world if we are Christian. We cannot be Christian and not take action. To be Christian means to be involved. To be Christian means to face ourselves and our actions or inactions, and work to change.

Marley says clearly he was so focused on one tiny part of life, that he blanked out all those instances of the breaking in of the realm of God where he could have had a part and made that realm more possible. Now he is doomed to keep reliving those times when he could have been paying attention and was too busy with himself. The chains which bind him and which he must carry are all those lost opportunities. 

Scrooge was lucky. Somehow, even though Marley had been denied the chance for redemption, he has somehow been allowed to return, and offer Scrooge the possibility of repentance. Scrooge, the man whose heart had been so weighted down by despair and pain that he cut himself off altogether, and could not see the coming. In the Gospel, Jesus says take care that you don’t get side-tracked by things in this life, don’t let your heart be weighed down with despair, be alert for signs of the coming realm.

And Scrooge, when faced with the very real work of change, does the completely human thing and says he thinks he’s rather pass on the opportunity, and just remain the way he is.

I can’t help but align these four spirits with the words we sometimes use in the service of communion – the mystery, and the hope of our faith: “Christ has died. Christ is risen. Christ will come again.” Christmas Past, Christmas Present, Christmas Yet to Come. What we were, what we are today, and what we may yet be.

Christmas in all of life, the birth of the child in our hearts, and what may grow. Thanks be to the one who calls us into life. For Scrooge, the light of hope and redemption shines through – he makes his walk to Bethlehem – through the valley of the shadow of death, and out the other side into the bright sunlight and celebration of Christmas in the world. In this story, we go forward with the largely unwilling Scrooge, on this walk to Bethlehem – with the light of Hope, Peace and Joy on the road. May it be so.


Sources:
  1. “A Christmas Carol” Stave 1. Text, spelling, and punctuation as published by Elliot Stock, 62, Paternoster Row, E.C., London, 1890, from 1881 photographs of the author's original 66-page Chapman and Hall manuscript and compared with the genuine First Edition {brown cloth}. 
2.      “Blessed Are the Poor?”, Pamela Couture. The Churches Centre for Theology and Public Policy.
  1. “The Ghosts of Christmas” Fran Ota, sermon December 2005



Saturday, November 26, 2016

“Getting to the Front of the Stable” Matthew 1:18-25 Annesley United Church Markdale Ontario




Preparing for the Christmas season in each church is always a different experience. Some churches leave all the planning to the minister – and in those places I can plan out a theme for Advent – sermons and worship; other churches, like Annesley, have things which are done every year, like the children’s cantata next Sunday - which means that there’s no sermon - so trying to paste together sermon theme doesn't quite work. So I decided to preach today a Christmas sermon which works for Advent too. Maybe as we go through the story this year, we'll

As this story goes, a Sunday School was putting on a Christmas pageant which included the story of Mary and Joseph coming to the inn. One boy wanted so very much to be Joseph, but when the parts were handed out, a boy he didn’t like was given that part, and he was assigned to be the inn-keeper instead. He was pretty upset about this but he didn’t say anything to the director.

During all the rehearsals he thought what he might do the night of performance to get even with this rival who got to be Joseph. Finally, the night of the performance, Mary and Joseph came walking across the stage. They knocked on the door of the inn, and the inn-keeper opened the door and asked them gruffly what they wanted.

Joseph answered, "We’d like to have a room for the night." Suddenly the inn-keeper threw the door open wide and said, "Great, come on in and I’ll give you the best room in the house!"

For a few seconds poor little Joseph didn’t know what to do. Thinking quickly on his feet, he looked inside the door past the inn-keeper then said, "No wife of mine is going to stay in a dump like this. Come on, Mary, let’s go to the barn." -And once again the play was back on track!

In all the Christmas pageants performed, Joseph mostly gets a silent role and inevitably takes up his place right at the back of the stable, but I think he is far more important than we have ever made him. Think about what he did! Everyone praises the courage of Mary, but who praises the courage of Joseph? Here is a man of integrity who always obeyed religious law, who is engaged to a young girl – and he finds out she is pregnant not by him. She says there was no other man, but the Holy Spirit which created the child.

By law Joseph has two choices: One, he can go through a kind of “divorce”, severing his promise of marriage. Mary and her family would be forced to leave the village go somewhere else, public scrutiny would be too much; or, he could call for her to be stoned to death for adultery.

Yet here is a man who hears angels - an angel who whispers to him to take Mary as his wife, and to trust God. In the English translation, we are told he marries Mary even though she is still a ‘virgin’.

In the Hebrew Scriptures, the Hebrew meaning of the word used is “young woman”.  When the Gospels were written, they were first written in Hebrew  - so for Joseph, Mary would not necessarily have been a technical virgin, just a young woman. The word is ‘alma’in the Hebrew. In Isaiah 7:14, it says, “a young woman shall conceive and give birth to a child.”

When the Gospels were translated from Hebrew to Greek, there was no corresponding word – one of the inevitable difficulties with translations which often changes the text - so the translator chose the Greek word 'parthenos' which meant a young woman or man who had not had sexual relations, but also 'beyond puberty but not yet married'.

Yet there was a commitment and a promise between Joseph and Mary. Mary’s father was required to pay a dowry; even though they were technically not married, all the same rules applied. If Joseph should die, she would be called a widow. If she died, he would be called a widower. If the engagement broke up, it would be called a divorce. During the time they were engaged, they were called husband and wife. While they were engaged, they were both expected to be virgins. The engagement was to last one year and then they were to be married.

In the biblical story, we are told, “Joseph was a just man.” That means that Joseph was a good man, a kind man, an honorable man. The Bible uses the word, “righteous.” Joseph was a righteous man. Then we come to this beautiful line, “Joseph was unwilling to put her to shame.” That line says mountains to us about Joseph. He didn’t want to hurt Mary. He didn’t want to destroy her. He was not punitive. He was not revengeful. He wasn’t out for a pound of her flesh. Instead, Joseph had these feelings of grace towards her, and so he resolved to divorce her quietly.  Not tell her parents. Not tell his parents. Not tell the rabbi. Not to tell the court so he could get his money back. So the very first story about the conception and birth of Jesus is a story of compassion, a story of grace, a story of a man with incredible generosity. In the eyes of that culture he had been deeply shamed, yet he still cared for Mary and took care of her.

The story continues. An angel or divine messenger appeared to Joseph in a dream and said, “Mary is pregnant by the Spirit of God. The Spirit hovered over her and she is now pregnant. You are to marry her and name the child Jesus for he will save the people from their sins. Call him Immanuel because God is always with us.” And so Joseph remained with Mary because he believed the dream and the message of the angel, and he knew that Mary was telling the truth.

Notice that Joseph never says a word, in the few times he appears in the birth narratives. He listens, he takes actions, but he never speaks. He's *there*. We might hope his words are recorded, because we can imagine the conversations he had with Mary, and the Angel Gabriel. We can “hear” him talking to the innkeeper. We can visualize him teaching Jesus about carpentry. After the birth he is again visited by an angel who tells him to take Mary and Jesus and flee into Egypt – a refugee family – where they live for two years. He reappears briefly again when an angel says it’s now safe to return to Nazareth, but then he fades from the rest of the narrative altogether. It is widely thought that Joseph was much older than Mary, which would be consistent with cultural practices. When Jesus finally begins ministry, Mary appears alone - the assumption is that Joseph has died and Mary is a widow.But we don't know - he just disappears.

I think of Joseph as a man of integrity. He was a carpenter - not quite an untouchable, but close to the lowest of the low. Yet he was also fluent in several languages - he would have to be, in order to work in the town of Sepphoris near Nazareth, where Greek, Roman and many other cultures rubbed elbows. He would also have been able to read. He seems like a man who plans carefully. When he was secure enough, he began to think about marriage. When he finds out Mary is pregnant, he risks being questioned and ridiculed. In those days, a marriage contract was worked out between families, and the engaged couple continued to live with their parents till their wedding. The townspeople could well have thought Mary and Joseph didn’t wait till their wedding. Joseph protected their reputation by moving up the wedding date, and the Roman census took them far away from the town’s questioning eyes.

Although Joseph came from the royal lineage of King David (thanks to the Gospel genealogy), we can easily picture him as a humble man. The brief portrait of him in Scripture suggests he was a quiet, unobtrusive man, available when needed, willing to endure hardship and disappointment. Looking forward to fathering his own child, his first was a child not his own. He accepted the humbling circumstances surrounding Jesus’ birth, and he trusted God as much as Mary did.

Instead of being indignant, he accepted the child as his own, and accepted the revealed will of God. He followed the instructions—journeying from Nazareth to Bethlehem, then to Egypt, then back to Nazareth. Instead of putting Mary aside, or rejecting the child, Joseph received the child as a gift from God.

I think it’s high time we take Joseph out from the back of the creche and put him right up front, with Mary, from the beginning.

Ann Weems, a Presbyterian elder and lecturer, wrote this poem, called “Getting to the Front of the Stable”.

Who put Joseph at the back of the stable?
Who dressed him in brown, put a staff in his hand,
            and told him to stand in the back of the creche,
            background for the magnificent light of the Madonna?

God-chosen, this man Joseph was faithful
            in spite of the gossip in Nazareth,
            in spite of the danger from Herod..
This man, Joseph, listened to angels,
            and it was he who named the child Emmanuel.
            Is this a man to be stuck for centuries at the back of the stable?

Actually, Joseph probably stood in the doorway,
            guarding the mother and child,
            or greeting shepherds and kings.
When he wasn’t in the doorway
            he was probably urging Mary to get some rest,
            gently covering her with his cloak,
            assuring her that he would watch the Child.
Actually he probably picked the Child up in his arms
            and walked him in the night,
            patting him lovingly until he closed his eyes.

This Christmas, let us give thanks to God
            for this man of incredible faith
            into whose are God placed the Christ Child.
As a gesture of gratitude,
            let’s put Joseph in the front of the stable
            where he can guard and greet
            and cast an occasional glance
               at this Child
                  who brought us life.


Sources:
1. “Getting to the Front of the Stable”, a sermon by Rev. Fran Ota, Christmas 2005.
2. “Joseph and the Virgin Birth”, a sermon by Rev. Edward F. Markquart, Grace Lutheran Church, Seattle, WA.
3. “Joseph—Father of Jesus” a sermon by Pastor Bob Leroe, Cliftondale Congregational Church, Saugus, Massachusetts
4. “Getting to the Front of the Stable”, a poem by Ann Weems. From “Kneeling in Bethlehem”. The Westminster Press, Philadelphia. 1987.

Saturday, November 19, 2016

“Deconstructing Christ, Reconstructing Jesus” Sermon for “Reign of Christ” Sunday November 20, 2016 Annesley United Church, Markdale



Jeremiah 23:1-6“Woe to the shepherds who destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture! Thus says the Lord, the God of Israel, concerning the shepherds who shepherd my people: It is you who have scattered my flock, and have driven them away, and you have not attended to them. So I will attend to you for your evil doings. Then I will gather the remnant of my flock out of all the lands where I have driven them, and I will bring them back to their fold, and they shall be fruitful and multiply. I will raise up shepherds over them who will shepherd them, and they shall not fear any longer, or be dismayed, nor shall any be missing.  The days are surely coming, when I will raise up for David a righteous Branch, and he shall reign as king and deal wisely, and shall execute justice and righteousness in the land. In his days Judah will be saved and Israel will live in safety. And this is the name by which he will be called: “God is our righteousness.”

Luke 1: 68-79
Wonderful is the Holy One of Israel, who has visited and set the people free, and has sounded the trumpet of new life for the descendants of David. As the prophets preached long ago, that we should be saved from those who would harm, and from the hands of those who hate us, to live by the love promised to our forebears. To remembering the holy covenant, made with Abraham; that being free from the grasp of enemies, we might serve God without being afraid and do good things in God’s presence throughout every day that we live. And you, little child, will be named the prophet of the Most High. For you will go on ahead, to prepare a new way, so that people will know true freedom as all their errors are forgiven. This will be the outcome of God’s yearning love, when the new dawn shall shine on the heights,  to shed light on those who cower in darkness and in the deep shadows of death, to guide our feet into the way of peace.
******************************************************************************
Today is generally known in the Christian year as “Christ the King” or “Reign of Christ” Sunday. It’s the last Sunday of the current liturgical year, before we begin a new year with the first Sunday of Advent, next week.

I confess I don’t really like this Sunday. The language of faith in our Christian history, became the language of empire – conquering, oppression, power, authority. We still use words like “King, Lord, throne, kingdom, conqueror”, and despite how we bend ourselves into pretzels explaining that we don’t really mean those words exactly that way, language is critical to how we see ourselves and see others. Here’s an example. Tolerance. Its root is in ‘tolerate’, and it means ‘to put up with’ ‘to allow to continue’. When we talk about ‘religious tolerance’ or ‘racial tolerance’, we’re still using a word which implies that we hold power to stop those things from happening if we change our minds. But what about the word ‘respect’? What would happen if we use the words ‘religious respect’, or ‘racial respect’. There is a difference – one is a power word, the other is a relationship word.  Language does matter.

There’s a group of like-minded people within the church who are moving away from the word ‘Christian’ and rather identifying as ‘People of the Way’ – the way the original followers of Jesus referred to themselves. How did we go from Jesus to Christ? Who was Jesus of Nazareth? What were the core values and the grounding in which his following developed? When did a first-century peasant known as Yeshua become known as “Christ”. What do we know? He lived and died.  He was a Jew, born in Galilee. Most of the people he knew  - colleagues, disciples, friends - were Jews. He went to services in synagogues, preached from Jewish text; celebrated Jewish festivals; went on pilgrimage to the Temple in Jerusalem. The gospels offer no sense that he came to found a new religion, nor that he was an educated rabbi. He was called ‘rabbi’ which means teacher, but that isn’t quite the same as being one.

The challenge, according to Biblical scholar John Dominic Crossan, always “asks about the relationship between any and every historically reconstructed Jesus and any and every theologically accepted Christ.”  The late Marcus Borg identifies Jesus as a spirit person, a teacher of wisdom, a social prophet, and almost by accident – founder of a movement. He's completely embedded in the Judaism of his time. He's not a Sadducee, nor a Pharisee, nor an Essene, nor an insurrectionist. He does argue with members of these other groups because that's what the Jews all did - argue with each other all the time...and because he has a particular view of an increasingly doctrinal faith which is rigid in law, at the loss of compassion and openness, and inclusion, which *is* the law.

He talks about God’s realm using the language of empire – since his listeners are well associated with that – but turns that upside down by describing an empire of equality. After the death of John he began to preach the realm of God as healing in the present, rather than imminent apocalypse.
There was an expectation following Jesus’ death that the Realm of God would arrive immediately, Nothing happened, and the followers simply went home not sure what to do. They started looking into their own scriptures to find something which might give the experience meaning – and found among others, the passage from Jeremiah describing the shepherd who would rise from the line of David. Note that both shepherd and king are mentioned. Now, Jeremiah was a prophet, but prophets didn’t predict the future – they spoke directly to the people of the time. So while Jeremiah’s text didn’t predict the coming of Jesus, it gave the early followers a frame for explaining the Jesus experience. Kings were not crowned in the way we think, but anointed to be shepherds of the people.
The resurrection narratives didn’t come along until approximately 70 years after Jesus’ death. The Jesus followers still continued to practice their faith – but identified as one of many small sects within Judaism. They called themselves ‘People of the Way’ and they simply went on doing what Jesus had taught them. In the book “How Jesus Became Christian”, author Barrie Wilson notes what he terms the “Conventional Model of Christian origins” - a straightforward chronological line from Jesus to church to Paul to wild success. This impression stems from the Book of Acts, written in the late first or early second century. Yet as noted above, the original Jesus movement continued – at least until the year 62 CE and the death of Jesus’ brother James – within Roman-occupied Israel. The resurrection stories were almost post-James, so the disciples didn’t have them. The Christ Movement arose out of Paul’s travels, and the two were at odds with each other. So little by little the original movement died off and was superseded by the Christ movement – and the leaders of both never met each other at all.
Paul was in Damascus when he had his conversion experience – and began reaching into the Gentile communities  about five years after Jesus' death. There were Greek-speaking communities in Greece, Turkey into Macedonia. Within that time a church was also founded in Rome, but not by Paul. 

Already there were Christians saying that the emperor and the state are ordained by God. By the third century, Christians are claiming loyalty to the state, and by the fourth century and the Emperor Constantine, Christianity is the mandated state religion with the now Greek word “Christ” Christos, anointed one – but now set up as a King  - and as the Roman empire gradually declined, the church of Constantine became the empire.

I want to go back to the notion of Christ and Jesus as two different persons – and revisit that definition of Jesus as Lord. In the church today, there appear to be several phenomena – one, a trend among the more conservative, fundamental and even reactionary practice of Christianity towards the Christ of Empire, Christ the post-Easter Deity, the Lord and King who supports violence as claiming and maintaining a way of life – the NRA types who brandish a Bible and a gun and claim Christ backs them up; the second, a more progressive Christianity which still uses that language, but claims the words no longer hold those same meanings; and third, a movement within and among what I will call ‘people of faith’, towards following the teachings and way of Jesus, the pre-Easter human person. Marcus Borg, John Shelby Spong, John Dominic Crossan, writers about the church such as Diana Butler Bass; and those who call themselves atheists or non-theists, within the structure of the church, such as my colleague Rev. Gretta Vosper in Toronto. It’s a stepping back from, a stripping away of, the traditional language and structures, to go back to the beginning – the ‘People of the Way’. It’s a re-claiming of original principles, a re-framing in different language, what Jesus was teaching. It says we don’t have to cling to formulae or doctrines to live the Way.

Both Jeremiah and the Luke passage set up this difference – woe to the poor shepherds who destroy the flocks, says Jeremiah – and maybe you could read into that the religious leaders in power, in any time and place - they will be replaced, says Jeremiah, by shepherds who have all the flock at heart; Zechariah sings of the new ‘king’ who sets things right, who prepares a new way, who teaches an alternate way of being that rejects violence and anger but is based in love. Jesus taught that the Realm of God was right at hand, right around the corner – and that love was the key.

For us, to reduce it to a perhaps simplistic formula – rather than ‘Christ the King”, I’d substitute ‘God is Love’, or even ‘Love is God’. It finally removes any barriers, and declares Love as the key. So God, by whatever name, is present. May it be so.

Sources from the original paper “From Christ to Jesus: Reclaiming the Way”
1.       Borg, Marcus. “Meeting Jesus Again for the First Time”. HarperOne, 1994.
2.       Crossan, John Dominic. “Jesus: A Revolutionary Biography”. HarperSanFrancisco, 1994.
3.      Curtis, Ken.  Church History Timeline 301-600 CE. http://www.christianity.com/church/church-history/timeline/301-600/constantine-11629643.html
4.      Fredriksen, Paula. “From Jesus to Christ”. Yale University Press, 1988.
5.      Meyers, Robin R. “Saving Jesus from the Church: How to Stop Worshipping Christ and Start Following Jesus”. HarperOne, 2009.
6.      Spong, John Shelby. “This Hebrew Lord”. HarperOne, 1993,
7.      Wilson, Barrie. “How Jesus Became Christian”. Random House Canada, 2008.
11.  Sermons from the New Testament “People of the Way” http://executableoutlines.com/text/ac9_2.htm







[1] Wilson, Barrie